Space in Theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. (Spatial by Russel West-Pavlov

By Russel West-Pavlov

Space in idea: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze seeks to offer an in depth yet succinct evaluate of the position of spatial mirrored image in 3 of the main influential French serious thinkers of contemporary many years. It proposes a step by step research of the altering position of house of their theories, focussing at the universal problematical all 3 critics deal with, yet highlighting the numerous ameliorations among them. It goals to rectify an unaccountable absence of unique research to the importance of house of their paintings up in the past. Space in Theory argues that Kristeva, Foucault and Deleuze deal with the query: How are which means and data produced in modern society? What makes it attainable to talk and imagine in methods we take without any consideration? the reply which all 3 thinkers supply is: house. This area takes a number of varieties: psychic, subjective house in Kristeva, power-knowledge-space in Foucault, and the areas of lifestyles as a number of flows of turning into in Deleuze. This booklet alternates among analyses of those thinkers' theoretical texts, and short digressions into literary texts via Barrico, de Beauvoir, Beckett, Bodrožić or Bonnefoy, through Borges, Forster, Gide, Gilbert, Glissant, corridor, to Kafka, Ondaatje, Perec, Proust, Sartre, Warner and Woolf. those detours via literature objective to render extra concrete and available the hugely advanced conceptulization of latest spatial idea. This quantity is aimed toward scholars, postgraduates and researchers drawn to the components of French poststructuralist thought, spatial mirrored image, or extra mostly modern cultural conception and cultural reports.

Show description

Read or Download Space in Theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. (Spatial Practices) PDF

Similar aerospace equipment books

Futurescapes: Space in Utopian and Science Fiction Discourses. (Spatial Practices)

This ebook testifies to the becoming curiosity within the many areas of utopia. It intends to 'map out' on utopian and science-fiction discourses the various new and revisionist types of spatial research utilized in Literary and Cultural experiences lately. the purpose of the amount is to side-step the validated favourite binary of utopia and dystopia or technological know-how fiction and therefore to open the research of utopian literature to new strains of inquiry.

Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity

City parks equivalent to ny City's primary Park offer very important public areas the place urban dwellers of all races and sessions can mingle accurately whereas having fun with quite a few recreations. by means of coming jointly in those secure settings, various teams develop into ok with one another, thereby strengthening their groups and the democratic cloth of society.

Extra resources for Space in Theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. (Spatial Practices)

Example text

It does not constitute sense on the basis of detachable units which can then be put together at will in a chain, and thus, for us, does not constitute meaning. At best it can be assimilated to a semi-linear oral economy. Leroi-Gouhran detects behind such arrangements of figures “un contexte oral avec lequel l’assemblage était coordonné et dont il reproduit spatialement les valeurs” [“an oral context with which the symbolic assembly was connected and whose values it reproduced spatially”] (Langage, cet inconnu 32).

At the same time, the book seeks to qualify praise while equally admitting critique. It mobilizes more critical, distanced perspectives upon Kristeva, Foucault and Deleuze so as to open up what may easily become an excessively proximate relationship to their thought. Likewise, to ensure that this book does not remain completely abstract and removed from the phenomena it tries to describe, but none the less in order to refract the theories through another medium, it attempts to illustrate the concepts it discusses via a large number of literary examples.

Granted, Kristeva may simply be reiterating a trope going back as far as classical philosophy which masculinizes time and feminizes space (Jardine 1985: 24-5). Despite this acquiescence to an ancient misogynist stereotype, it is none the less striking that Kristeva consistently privileges the latter half of the binary, discretely but insistently foregrounding its spatial aspects, in her work on poetics. What erupts into the realm of coherent communication, disrupting the well-oiled functioning of common-sense semantics and syntax, is a space – but more significantly, space.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.54 of 5 – based on 13 votes